Re: Qos on Frame relay interfaces

From: Anant Tamgole (anant.tamgole@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Aug 16 2008 - 02:17:11 ART


Thanks.

Can we say, if we have a single DLCI, either of the methods can be used.

Anant

On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Scott Morris <
smorris@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:

> It all depends on how many things you are doing, and how many DLCIs are
> present on a particular interface.
>
> In general, #2 will apply to ALL DLCIs on a particular
> interface/subinterface without regard to the DLCI number.
>
> #1, will allow you to apply specific details on a per-DLCI basis.
>
> So it just depends on what you are looking to accomplish! Test it out
> though. I'd be familiar with both!
>
> HTH,
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
> Senior CCIE Instructor
>
> smorris@internetworkexpert.com
>
>
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>
> Knowledge is power.
> Power corrupts.
> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Anant Tamgole
> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 12:31 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Qos on Frame relay interfaces
>
> Hi,
>
> I have seen two ways of applying policy-map to frame-relay interfaces. What
> is the difference between two and when to use which method.
>
> 1. Using map-class commad
> 2. Direct under the interface.
>
> e.g.
> 1.
> !
> map-class frame-relay FR-CLASS
> service-policy output <POLICY-MAP-NAME> !
> int s0/0
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay class FR-CLASS
>
> 2.
> int s0/0
> service-policy output <POLICY-MAP-NAME>
>
>
> Anant
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:30 ART