From: John (jgarrison1@austin.rr.com)
Date: Sat Aug 16 2008 - 01:59:24 ART
There might be a difference in the way it's proccessed, but the end result
is the same. Your missing at least a third way to shape on frame
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/qos/configuration/guide/fqos_c.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anant Tamgole" <anant.tamgole@gmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 10:30 PM
Subject: Qos on Frame relay interfaces
> Hi,
>
> I have seen two ways of applying policy-map to frame-relay interfaces.
> What
> is the difference between two and when to use which method.
>
> 1. Using map-class commad
> 2. Direct under the interface.
>
> e.g.
> 1.
> !
> map-class frame-relay FR-CLASS
> service-policy output <POLICY-MAP-NAME>
> !
> int s0/0
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay class FR-CLASS
>
> 2.
> int s0/0
> service-policy output <POLICY-MAP-NAME>
>
>
> Anant
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:30 ART