Re: Etherchannel packer drop?

From: Radioactive Frog (pbhatkoti@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Aug 12 2008 - 07:23:50 ART


I think they are belongs to each other too.
When you create the ether-channel the port priority bumps up to 12, default
port priority is 19

show int port-channelx should show if there are any drop packets.

frog

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:01 PM, KS Anpu <ksanpu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Spanning tree and Ether channel are totally different.
> and if you bundle say 3 links as one logical link (Ether channel) then
> spanning tree will count all these three links as one link.It will not drop
> the packet until one link exist in the bundle.
>
> Regards,
> Anbu.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 1:56 PM, CCIE Hunter <cisco.ccie.guru@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi, all gent sorry if my question is going to be silly.
> >
> > Let's say etherchannel is running with 2 links, if 1 link fail will it be
> > cause packet drop??
> > I think if I use spanning tree instead of etherchannel, if 1 link fail it
> > may cause a few packer drop right because it take time to recalculate
> path
> > ?
> >
> > which one could be the best choice without packet drop?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:30 ART