From: Scott Morris (smorris@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Aug 11 2008 - 10:58:20 ART
One would first have to ask WHY! :)
If they are talking to each other's networks, then you're looking at a NAT
scenario which can get kind of hairy depending on your applications and
firewall capabilities!
Otherwise, if there are no overlapping host addresses, you could also bridge
them together.... But again, this may produce some ugly results!
Good luck with it all!
Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
Senior CCIE Instructor
smorris@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344
4
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Monica Belluci
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 4:46 AM
To: Cisco certification; Cisco certification
Subject: Doubt - Network Solution Provider or Infrastructure Redesigning
Dear GS,
Suppose I have two companies want to interconnect with each other having
same IP subnet blocks on both side
1) Company A - subnet 172.16.1.0/24 ,Subnet 10.1.1.0/16
2) Company B - Subnet 172.16.1.0/24 ,Subnet 10.1.1.0/16 On both side We
have more than 700 hosts + Servers What is the better way to do
communication between them without changing Ip addresses ?
Thanks
Monica Bell
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:30 ART