From: Harindha Fernando (pottaharry@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 06 2008 - 11:38:05 ART
Hi,
we are using the following output policy-map in MPLS interface,
class-map match-any E-RT-VIDEO
match ip dscp cs4
match ip dscp af41
match ip dscp af42
match ip dscp af43
match mpls experimental topmost 4
class-map match-any E-RT-VOICE
match ip dscp ef
match mpls experimental topmost 5
class-map match-all I-CCTV-SCAVENGER
match access-group name TRAFFIC-MULTICAST
class-map match-any E-SCAVENGER
match ip dscp cs1
match mpls experimental topmost 1
class-map match-all I-CCTV-LLMULTIMEDIA
match access-group name TRAFFIC-UNICAST
class-map match-any E-LL-MULTIMEDIA
match ip dscp cs3
match ip dscp af31
match ip dscp af32
match ip dscp af33
match mpls experimental topmost 3
class-map match-any E-LL-DATA
match ip dscp cs2
match ip dscp af21
match ip dscp af22
match ip dscp af23
match mpls experimental topmost 2
!
policy-map E-POL-FLEX-CHILD
class E-RT-VOICE
priority 2800
set mpls exp topmost 5
class E-RT-VIDEO
bandwidth percent 10
random-detect dscp-based
set mpls exp topmost 4
class E-LL-MULTIMEDIA
bandwidth percent 25
random-detect dscp-based
set mpls exp topmost 3
set ip dscp cs3
class E-LL-DATA
bandwidth percent 15
random-detect dscp-based
set mpls exp topmost 2
class E-SCAVENGER
bandwidth percent 1
random-detect dscp-based
set mpls exp topmost 1
class class-default
set mpls exp topmost 0
random-detect
policy-map E-POL-FLEX
class class-default
shape average 20000000
service-policy E-POL-FLEX-CHILD
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/0
description *** Connected to PE7 -Gi1/0/0 *
dampening
mtu 1536
bandwidth 20000
ip address 172.20.6.1 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
ip router isis
ip pim sparse-mode
load-interval 30
carrier-delay msec 0
speed 100
no negotiation auto
mpls ip
bfd interval 100 min_rx 100 multiplier 3
cdp enable
isis circuit-type level-2-only
isis network point-to-point
isis authentication mode md5
isis authentication key-chain MOI
isis bfd
service-policy output E-POL-FLEX
class-map match-all TEST
match access-group 15
policy-map I-POL-CCTV
class TEST
set ip dscp cs3
interface Vlan10
description ### Multicast-server ###
ip vrf forwarding CCTV
ip address 192.168.6.1 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
ip pim sparse-mode
service-policy input I-POL-CCTV
Rgds,
Harin
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Robert McCallum <rmccallum@thrupoint.net>wrote:
> Your multicast traffic is IP based on not MPLS based. So where normally an
> outbound policy would look like ...
>
> Match mpls exp 5
>
> You also need to match your ip equivalent e.g. match ip dscp ef
>
> Common mistake when it comes to multicast in MVPN. Just remember that you
> can tear down an mpls neighbour which you know multicast traffic runs
> across
> and it still works, whereas all ip non multicast traffic is blackholed.
>
> Watchout on the GSR's and on some linecards as multicast is only ever put
> into the default queue.
>
> HTH
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> > Behalf Of Harindha Fernando
> > Sent: 06 August 2008 14:14
> > To: comserv@groupstudy.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: QoS for mVPN
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been trying to set QoS for mVPN in MPLS QoS but I am
> > still unable to achieve it. below is the scenario...
> >
> > Reciever1 -->PE1-->P1-->P2-->PE2--->Source
> > |
> > |
> > P3--->PE3--->Receiver2
> >
> > Core - PIM SSM
> > Customer mVPN - PIM-SSM with static SSM mapping
> >
> > mVPN is working fine, but I need to offer some QoS in the core.
> >
> > at PE2 customer interface I have a input policy-map setting
> > all muliticast traffic on that interface, set to DSCP AF41.
> > the MPLS interface towards core I have an output policy
> > allocating BW based on dscp or exp marking and also I do set
> > exp values. DSCP AF41 = Exp 4
> >
> > when I put a output policy in the PE1 and PE3 customer
> > interfaces to match DSCP AF41 I do not see any matching packets.
> >
> > since mVPN traffic is going through GRE tunnels I don't see
> > any possibility of setting the DSCP values in the GRE header
> > as this Tunnel interfaces are not configurable.
> >
> > can any body tell how can we achieve the QoS for mVPN ?
> >
> > I am using 7600s with RSP720 and 12.2(33)SRC1.
> >
> >
> > Rgds,
> > Harin
> >
> > _____________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/comserv.html
> >
>
>
>
> Note:The information contained in this message may be privileged and
> confidential and protected from disclosure . If the reader of this message
> is not the
> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
> message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> us
> immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
> Thankyou. ThruPoint Ltd.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:29 ART