From: Hobbs (deadheadblues@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Aug 04 2008 - 21:28:13 ART
Feasible successor is not better than the successor :-)
It is better than the successor's reported distance (the distance as
reported from the neighbor of the successor route).
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Mark Stephanus Chandra <
mark.chandra@gmail.com> wrote:
> dEAR Expert,
>
>
>
> I'm kinda confuse with eigrp concept recently. Just come up in my mind.
>
>
>
> It is about a successor and feasible successor.
>
>
>
> So, In my Understanding of EIGRP concept right now :
>
>
>
> EIGRP will choose the best metric, and become Feasible Distance , right ?
>
>
>
> So If a ROUTE wants to be a feasible successor, It must have better metric
> than feasible distance, right ?
>
>
>
> So, it comes a question, so feasible successor is always better than a
> successor but a successor the one who become the primary route, Why ?
>
>
>
> Because feasible successor have better metric than successor right ?
>
>
>
> Please get me out of my confusion of EIGRP concept right here hehhee.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance for you all
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Mark Stephanus Chandra
> IT Consultant
> EX Computindo
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:29 ART