From: Mark Stephanus Chandra (mark.chandra@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Aug 04 2008 - 22:32:18 ART
Hi Hobbs,
Thanks a lot for the explanation, buta sorry, I still don't get it.
Sorry if I ask too much, but maybe it is better with a example of simple
drawing of topology. It can help much.
Regards
Mark Stephanus Chandra
IT Consultant
From: Hobbs [mailto:deadheadblues@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 7:28 AM
To: Mark Stephanus Chandra
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: EIGRP Concept
Feasible successor is not better than the successor :-)
It is better than the successor's reported distance (the distance as
reported from the neighbor of the successor route).
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Mark Stephanus Chandra
<mark.chandra@gmail.com> wrote:
dEAR Expert,
I'm kinda confuse with eigrp concept recently. Just come up in my mind.
It is about a successor and feasible successor.
So, In my Understanding of EIGRP concept right now :
EIGRP will choose the best metric, and become Feasible Distance , right ?
So If a ROUTE wants to be a feasible successor, It must have better metric
than feasible distance, right ?
So, it comes a question, so feasible successor is always better than a
successor but a successor the one who become the primary route, Why ?
Because feasible successor have better metric than successor right ?
Please get me out of my confusion of EIGRP concept right here hehhee.
Thanks in advance for you all
Regards
Mark Stephanus Chandra
IT Consultant
EX Computindo
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:29 ART