From: CCIE3000 (ccie3000@googlemail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 01 2008 - 14:15:41 ART
With this type of question I would do a default-passive and then just no
passive the interfaces I was told to run rip on....
If there was something else in the question a little different from the norm
then I'd clarify with proctor.
On 8/1/08, Li Xiao Shawn NCS <xiaoshawn@ncs.com.sg> wrote:
>
> Hi GSs,
> Let say in the lab I got a router has the below interfaces:
>
> Fa0/0 : 147.1.0.0/24
> Ser1/0: 147.1.8.0/24
> Ser1/1: 147.1.11.0/24
>
> And I am asked to enable rip on interface ser 1/0. Does this
> requirement imply that I must filter out the updates for network
> 147.1.0.0/24 and 147.1.11.0/24 when it was advertised out ser1/0? Cos
> to enable rip on ser1/0 I will have to use "net 147.1.0.0", and that
> actually put all three interfaces RIP enable I guess. Passive interface
> will just stop the update from being sent out that interface but no
> stopping the interface route from being advertised.
>
> Thanks for your feedback
>
> Best regards,
> Shawn
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:29 ART