From: Scott Morris (smorris@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Fri Jul 25 2008 - 16:20:16 ART
If all devices are Cisco, things tend to work a bit more "magically" lately.
Kinda irritating if you're looking for operational versus correct!
Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
Senior CCIE Instructor
smorris@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344
Online Community: http://www.IEOC.com
CCIE Blog: http://blog.internetworkexpert.com
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Dailong Li
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 3:14 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: frame-relay encapsulation type
Hi,experts:
I have a question about frame-relay encapsulation type.
R1 is hub,R2,R3 are spoke.
R1:
int s0/0
en frame ietf
ip add 11.11.123.1 255.255.255.0
frame map ip 11.11.123.2 102 b
frame map ip 11.11.123.3 103 b
R2:
int s0/0
en fram
ip add 11.11.123.2 255.255.255.0
fram map ip 11.11.123.1 201 b
fram map ip 11.11.123.3 201 b
R3:
int s0/0
en fram
ip add 11.11.123.3 255.255.255.0
fram map ip 11.11.123.1 301 b
fram map ip 11.11.123.2 301 b
R1 encapsulation is ietf. and i did not add ietf keyword on R2 and R3.
i can still ping each other.
My question is ,if there is any issues when encapsulation types are
different between devices?
Thanks in advance.
David
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:57 ART