From: Alexey Tolstenok (alextols@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 16 2008 - 21:19:41 ART
Hi Narbik,
I've configured identical passwords too if you look at me config - and I
don't have RIP routes on R1 according to your assumption.
But according to RFC and common sense this one-way accepting of RIP routes
is nothing but bug, not a flexibility.
2008/7/17 Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>:
> Alexey Tolstenok
> I did not have two different keys configured, if you look at my
> configuration, i have configured Key 1 on R1 and Key 2 on R2 and the
> passwords are identical, and i am showing that the higher key number
> receives and processes the routes, whereas, the router with a lower Key
> number does NOT.
> In RIPv2, if you want both routers to exchange and process routes, and you
> need MD5 authentication, the key numbers *MUST* match or else the routers
> will not exchange routes. I was only showing the weird behavior because of
> Petr's assumption of my configuration. I just wanted to show that there are
> many behavioral issues in an IOS that is so flexible.
>
>
-- Alexey Tolstenok CCIEx2 (R&S, SP) #17405, JNCIE-M #313, CCSI #31737
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:55 ART