From: Narbik Kocharians (narbikk@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 16 2008 - 22:48:50 ART
You mean it works differently with another IOS? I am using 12.4
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Alexey Tolstenok <alextols@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Narbik,
> I've configured identical passwords too if you look at me config - and I
> don't have RIP routes on R1 according to your assumption.
>
> But according to RFC and common sense this one-way accepting of RIP routes
> is nothing but bug, not a flexibility.
>
> 2008/7/17 Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>:
>
>> Alexey Tolstenok
>> I did not have two different keys configured, if you look at my
>> configuration, i have configured Key 1 on R1 and Key 2 on R2 and the
>> passwords are identical, and i am showing that the higher key number
>> receives and processes the routes, whereas, the router with a lower Key
>> number does NOT.
>> In RIPv2, if you want both routers to exchange and process routes, and you
>> need MD5 authentication, the key numbers *MUST* match or else the routers
>> will not exchange routes. I was only showing the weird behavior because of
>> Petr's assumption of my configuration. I just wanted to show that there are
>> many behavioral issues in an IOS that is so flexible.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Alexey Tolstenok
> CCIEx2 (R&S, SP) #17405, JNCIE-M #313, CCSI #31737
>
-- Narbik Kocharians CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) www.MicronicsTraining www.Net-Workbooks.com Sr. Technical Instructor
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:55 ART