RE: If I didn't sepceify the ip ssh version , what would be the

From: Sean C (upp_and_upp@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jul 04 2008 - 20:41:19 ART

Next message: Pavlo Bykov: "Re: frame-relay de-list"
Previous message: Pavlo Bykov: "Re: If I didn't sepceify the ip ssh version , what would be the"
Maybe in reply to: ccie: "If I didn't sepceify the ip ssh version , what would be the"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: If I didn't sepceify the ip ssh version , what would be the"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Amin,

Good question - had me wondering myself. Found this:

Defaults - If this command is not configured, SSH operates in compatibility
mode, that is, Version 1 and Version 2 are both supported.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/security/command/reference/sec_i3.html#w
p1012351

HTH,
Sean C #17085

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of ccie
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 4:08 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: If I didn't sepceify the ip ssh version , what would be the default
version?

Hi experts,

If I didn't sepceify the ip ssh version , what would be the default version?

Regards,

Amin

Next message: Pavlo Bykov: "Re: frame-relay de-list"
Previous message: Pavlo Bykov: "Re: If I didn't sepceify the ip ssh version , what would be the"
Maybe in reply to: ccie: "If I didn't sepceify the ip ssh version , what would be the"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: If I didn't sepceify the ip ssh version , what would be the"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:53 ART