RE: If I didn't sepceify the ip ssh version , what would be the

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Fri Jul 04 2008 - 21:19:33 ART


Cisco's a little strange in the numbering scheme...

If they say SSH 1.5 has been enabled, that will only accept v1. If it says
SSH 1.99 then it will accept SSH v2 or v1 connections.

I think that's been the case longer. I seem to remember 12.2T things with
that, although I may be hallucinating.

Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
Senior CCIE Instructor

smorris@internetworkexpert.com

 

Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/

Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Pavlo Bykov
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 7:40 PM
To: ccie
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: If I didn't sepceify the ip ssh version , what would be the
default version?

IOS output:

---
Generating RSA keys ...
[OK]
R1(config)#
00:07:12: %SSH-5-ENABLED: SSH 1.99 has been enabled
---

It's 1.99 in quite recent 12.2(25)S15. I remember seeing 1.99 being default in documentation as well.

P.S. SSHv1.99 means v2 with v1 fallback enabled.

Regards,

Pavel Bykov

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:07 PM, ccie <ccie@just-horizon.com> wrote:

> Hi experts, > > If I didn't sepceify the ip ssh version , what would be the default > version? > > Regards, > > Amin > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > _ Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:53 ART