From: mgreenlee@ipexpert.com
Date: Wed Jun 25 2008 - 22:59:54 ART
Scott and I recommend to review RFC 2549, which covers some important transport information.
Delivered-To: marvin@ipexpert.com
Received: by 10.142.161.6 with SMTP id j6cs614wfe; Wed, 25 Jun 2008
18:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.90.68.20 with SMTP id
q20mr14542572aga.107.1214444210887; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:36:50 -0700
(PDT)
Return-Path: <ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com>
Received: from lists.groupstudy.com (lists.groupstudy.com
[67.19.171.90]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id
7si11277889ywo.7.2008.06.25.18.36.50; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:36:50 -0700
(PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
designates 67.19.171.90 as permitted sender) client-ip=67.19.171.90;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com designates 67.19.171.90 as permitted
sender) smtp.mail=ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com; dkim=neutral (body
hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from lists.groupstudy.com (lists [127.0.0.1]) by
lists.groupstudy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5Q1aLj0014653;
Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:36:21 -0400
Received: (from sympa@localhost) by lists.groupstudy.com
(8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m5Q1aKtL014639; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:36:20
-0400
Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [208.73.222.90]) by
lists.groupstudy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5Q1a1x2014475 for
<ccielab@lists.groupstudy.com>; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:36:01 -0400
Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1]) by
groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m5Q1aCAC002328
GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:36:12 -0400
Received: (from listserver@localhost) by groupstudy.com
(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id m5Q1aC9Z002326 for
ccielabxhiddenx; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:36:12 -0400
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com
[209.85.146.180]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with
ESMTP id m5Q1aBJ4002306 GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:36:11
-0400
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v33so1178956wah.24 for
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;
s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
bh=pvdV4M9LGQSdeWPBZskURb95xGkABIewl7nkRpMYKOA=;
b=vFHFL/f85rzV8wWrPZpXDoDCbECW7pLIO3ucduRwE6xCTEd7B+JXlX2W8qycoUx3pI
/hNNkIx5rurhNfchS0BbN/y/FQRrIkiTkOX5HdwxeYcKyN2RQguCwEHdbmCF5X14Lj/g
mNvV01azgl3RqjBPKyl2q4B7h/Zk72vHo9jX4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:references;
b=T5JAxtAxnwbQXSJeCUTRj2891BdxukZ/3wQTkFtVi63pQmBAtazjsCyXhW6rYPxE30
DSwA2cN+/AlkRkPxgNIKfDwzr+glAfi/DAgbDTANwMNoT++2jkkYi824wtTnK2YyZVde
Tr9DZ7orjBJjH4QEO+r9fSJDd5Y+jvkw73LLg=
Received: by 10.115.50.5 with SMTP id c5mr6669507wak.60.1214444167998;
Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.167.13 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:36:07 -0700
(PDT)
Message-ID: <29682903.3361214445592789.JavaMail.fastmobile@pfmsync01.prod.helio.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:36:07 +1000
From: "Radioactive Frog" <pbhatkoti@gmail.com>
To: "L. Jankok" <lj@2u2.nu>
Subject: Re: OT: L2 vs L3 mpls
Cc: "GNS3 and SecureCRT Tabs" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
In-Reply-To: <ximss-387672@2u2.nu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
References: <491cc1330806251830o519981b4pcbda1fce058fca9f@mail.gmail.com>
<ximss-387672@2u2.nu>
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by GroupStudy
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match [from pbhatkoti@gmail\.com] (2008/06/25
21:36:12)
Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
Reply-To: "Radioactive Frog" <pbhatkoti@gmail.com>
X-Loop: ccielab@groupstudy.com
X-Sequence: 7421
Errors-to: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
Precedence: list
X-no-archive: yes
List-Id: <ccielab.groupstudy.com>
List-Archive: <http://lists.groupstudy.com/mailserver/arc/ccielab>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ccielab-request@groupstudy.com>
List-Post: <mailto:ccielab@groupstudy.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=subscribe%20ccielab>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=unsubscribe%20ccielab>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Which one is the fast?
Has anyone done testing ...?
eg. thorughput, speed etc...
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:26 AM, L. Jankok <lj@2u2.nu> wrote:
> L2 mpls vpls if you want transparent ethernet and don't want to participate
> in the routing stuff.
>
> L3 mpls if you want to participate in the routing stuff.
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:30:52 +1000
> "Radioactive Frog" <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
> : Anyone shed some light on this?
> : -Which one to choose, and why...
> : : :
> _______________________________________________________________________
> : Subscription information may be found at:
> : http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> : : : :
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:23 ART