From: Radioactive Frog (pbhatkoti@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Jun 26 2008 - 21:15:17 ART
Thanks everyone..
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:59 AM, <mgreenlee@ipexpert.com> wrote:
> Scott and I recommend to review RFC 2549, which covers some important
> transport information.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Radioactive Frog" <pbhatkoti@gmail.com>
> To: "L. Jankok" <lj@2u2.nu>
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:36:07 +1000
> Subject: Re: OT: L2 vs L3 mpls
> Which one is the fast?
>
> Has anyone done testing ...?
> eg. thorughput, speed etc...
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:26 AM, L. Jankok <lj@2u2.nu> wrote:
>
> > L2 mpls vpls if you want transparent ethernet and don't want to
> participate
> > in the routing stuff.
> >
> > L3 mpls if you want to participate in the routing stuff.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:30:52 +1000
> > "Radioactive Frog" <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
> > : Anyone shed some light on this?
> > : -Which one to choose, and why...
> > : : :
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > : Subscription information may be found at:
> > : http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > : : : :
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:23 ART