From: darth router (darklordrouter@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 23 2008 - 17:53:08 ART
I hope it ends up a solid cert, and increases my pay scale potential :D If
so, I'm on board. Meanwhile still plugging on the not so marketable SP IE,
just because the technology is fun!!
DR
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> I think it's a little premature to relegate it that far down.
>
> What methology would you like to see used? And how can you make it a
> scalable/reproducable concept? That's the hard part with developing any
> exam.
>
> The exam is still in beta and is being evaluated by a number of
> highly-qualified (not to mention overly-opinionated) people. I would
> suspect that any changes that need to take place, or things to make sure it
> does no become a brain-dump-able test are being worked through!
>
> Patience grasshopper....
>
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
> #153, JNCIS-ER, MCSE, CCDP, CCNA-WAN Switching, CCSP, Cable Communications
> Specialist, IP Telephony Support Specialist, IP Telephony Design
> Specialist,
> CISSP
> CCSI #21903, JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
> swm@emanon.com
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> darth router
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 3:53 PM
> To: Zahid Hassan
> Cc: Hoogen; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: CCDE
>
> So much for the CCDE being bigger and badder like we originally thought.
> Gonna be a weekend braindumper :D
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Zahid Hassan <zhassan@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> > Hoogen,
> >
> >
> > I can't really agree with you on this less.
> >
> > This is going to be a disgrace to many of us who were very keenly
> > looking forward to this new track.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > Zahid
> >
> > CCIE #14103 (R&S/SP/SEC)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of Hoogen
> > Sent: 23 June 2008 18:11
> > To: Dane Newman
> > Cc: Neil Moore; Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: CCDE
> >
> > I can't believe that Cisco is doing this, doesn't make sense a
> > computer based test?? Did anyone take this during the networkers? I
> > would preferred it if I had to explain my final design to the proctor
> > administering the exam, even if it had been computer based. How would
> > they grade the final design now?
> >
> > -Hoogen
> >
> >
> > On 6/23/08, Dane Newman <dane.newman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Take a look at this
> > >
> > > http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29094
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Neil Moore <neil@droopy.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I see a ton of stuff on the CCIE tracks.. but I only see one
> > > > Breakout session on the CCDE though... is this track not getting
> > > > any
> > traction?
> > > >
> > > > Neil Moore CCIE5 #10044 (Current Complete Set)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________________________
> > > > __ ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________________
> > > __ _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:22 ART