From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Jun 23 2008 - 17:10:48 ART
I think it's a little premature to relegate it that far down.
What methology would you like to see used? And how can you make it a
scalable/reproducable concept? That's the hard part with developing any
exam.
The exam is still in beta and is being evaluated by a number of
highly-qualified (not to mention overly-opinionated) people. I would
suspect that any changes that need to take place, or things to make sure it
does no become a brain-dump-able test are being worked through!
Patience grasshopper....
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, MCSE, CCDP, CCNA-WAN Switching, CCSP, Cable Communications
Specialist, IP Telephony Support Specialist, IP Telephony Design Specialist,
CISSP
CCSI #21903, JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
swm@emanon.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
darth router
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 3:53 PM
To: Zahid Hassan
Cc: Hoogen; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: CCDE
So much for the CCDE being bigger and badder like we originally thought.
Gonna be a weekend braindumper :D
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Zahid Hassan <zhassan@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hoogen,
>
>
> I can't really agree with you on this less.
>
> This is going to be a disgrace to many of us who were very keenly
> looking forward to this new track.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Zahid
>
> CCIE #14103 (R&S/SP/SEC)
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of Hoogen
> Sent: 23 June 2008 18:11
> To: Dane Newman
> Cc: Neil Moore; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: CCDE
>
> I can't believe that Cisco is doing this, doesn't make sense a
> computer based test?? Did anyone take this during the networkers? I
> would preferred it if I had to explain my final design to the proctor
> administering the exam, even if it had been computer based. How would
> they grade the final design now?
>
> -Hoogen
>
>
> On 6/23/08, Dane Newman <dane.newman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Take a look at this
> >
> > http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29094
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Neil Moore <neil@droopy.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I see a ton of stuff on the CCIE tracks.. but I only see one
> > > Breakout session on the CCDE though... is this track not getting
> > > any
> traction?
> > >
> > > Neil Moore CCIE5 #10044 (Current Complete Set)
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________________
> > > __ ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > __ _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:22 ART