From: Chris Gray (chris.gray@ozonenetworks.net)
Date: Wed May 28 2008 - 07:24:12 ART
What a fantastic article from Petr Lapukhov
All my questions answered in one go.
Thanks again for your help .
Kriz
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Michael Smith
Sent: 28 May 2008 10:34
To: 'Chris Gray'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: The old favourite - Service policy on FR interface vs service
policy in a map-class on FR Interface vs Traffic shaping AGH
Check out
http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/category/ccie-routing-switching/frame-rel
ay/. There are several posts collected here describing Legacy and MQC
styles...
-Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Chris Gray
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 11:03 AM
To: 'Radioactive Frog'
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: The old favourite - Service policy on FR interface vs service
policy in a map-class on FR Interface vs Traffic shaping AGH
Thanks again,
Have you got a link for the Petr Lukhov article?
Kriz
________________________________________
From: Radioactive Frog [mailto:pbhatkoti@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 May 2008 03:13
To: Chris Gray
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: The old favourite - Service policy on FR interface vs service
policy in a map-class on FR Interface vs Traffic shaping AGH
Have a look at the internetworkexpert's blog. There is a nice article on
Frame-relay posted by Petr Lukhov. That will answer your all questions.
Hi Experts,
Has anyone found any clear documentation on how and when to use
Service-policy style MQC With frame relay,
Frog>> this is the latest new method to create in this style, shape the
traffic in regular MQC style for frame-relay.
When to enable frame relay
traffic shaping, when not to , when to use a map-class , when not to etc.
FROG>>> Map class is required if you are doing frame-relay traffic shapping.
Am I right in thinking we are at a cross point in technology between legacy
and new i.e. legacy being frame relay traffic shaping, priority queuing, and
the modern day equivalents achieved through MQC.
Not sure about others, but I am never sure how to answer a Qos & Frame Relay
question. Whether to use MQC and apply to the interface or whether to use
MQC and apply through a map-class. Even when I do, when should we enable
'frame relay traffic shaping' under the Frame interface?
Anyone provide any sanity on this topic?
Regards
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:18 ART