From: Tony Schaffran \(GS\) (groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Sun May 25 2008 - 12:45:26 ART
Yes, the example would be incorrect, but the logic he has shown and
explained is correct.
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of dara
tomar
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 7:01 AM
To: ccievoice1
Cc: Radioactive Frog; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Match-all vs match-any
*I am sure,
The first one is incorrect !!!
How can we match two dscp values in a single packet ??
Regards,
Dara*
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 6:43 PM, ccievoice1 <ccievoice1@gmail.com> wrote:
> YES
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > *Example#1
> > *Class-map *match-all* test1
> > match ip dscp CS3
> > match ip dscp AF31
> >
> > result# the test1 class - must match CS3+AF31, otherwise this class
will
> > not work.
> >
> > *Example#2
> > *Class-map *match-any* test1
> > match ip dscp CS3
> > match ip dscp AF31
> >
> > result# the test1 class will can match either CS3 or AF31
> >
> > *Example#3
> > *Class-map *match-all* test1
> > match ip dscp CS3 AF31
> >
> > result# the test1 class will can match either CS3 or AF31
> >
> > According to my understanding Example 2 and example 3 are the same.
> >
> > Am I right?
> >
> > -Frog
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:18 ART