Re: bgp network

From: John (jgarrison1@austin.rr.com)
Date: Fri May 16 2008 - 19:20:43 ART


I've gotten better at not sending out stupid stuff, but I'm not quite there.
Consider the question rhetorical at this point.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 4:01 PM
Subject: bgp network

>I seem to be getting the results asked for. Is
>
> route-map path
> match int f0/0.1001
> set community local-as
>
> bgp 65145
> red conn route-map path
>
> the same as, when I say the same I mean achieve the same results.
>
> route-map path1
> set community local-as
>
> router bgp 65145
> net 174.1.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 route-map path1
>
>
>
> The 174.1.1.0 network is attatched to f0/0.1001. I'm supposed to
> advertise
> the 174.1.1.0 network and make sure it's not advertised outside the AS
> without
> using ditribute or prefix lists. I seem to have achieved the desired
> result,
> but I'm probably missing something. I' using no other route maps anywhere
> on
> this router. any input welcome
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:17 ART