From: mac ccie (mac2008.ccie@gmail.com)
Date: Mon May 12 2008 - 03:17:28 ART
> Hi Scott,
>
> My question was different. does passive interface on interface mean that
> RIP is not running on that interface? I thought it just mean that do not
> advertize RIP updates on that interface.
>
> Looks like my topology diagram was not clear initialy.
>
> R5 fa0/1 has no passive interface and R5 s0/1 has passive interface. R5
> still advertise s0/1 network to Fa0/1 connected RIP routers. Does it imply
> that I am not running RIP on s0/1?
>
> I think I am still running RIP on R5 s0/1 because I see this network
> connected to s0/1 on on other RIP enabled routers. In RIP it is not possible
> to say that advertise 10.1.0.0 but not 10.2.0.0 out non passive interface.
> perhaps distribute list is the answer for this task?
>
> Thanks,
> Mac
>
>
> On 5/12/08, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
>>
>> Isn't that what "passive-interface" was designed for?
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> mac
>> ccie
>> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 1:47 AM
>> To: Cisco certification
>> Subject: disabling RIP on an interface, is it possible??
>>
>> Hello GS,
>>
>> is it possible to disable running RIP on an interface if it is part of
>> major
>> network command configured? This is from IE lab vol2-task 4.8. It says "Do
>> not enable RIP on any other interface".
>>
>> ----------(136.1.57.5/24)fa0/1 R5 s0/1 (136.1.45.0/24)-------------------
>> RIP OSPF
>>
>>
>> If I enable RIP on fa0/1 on R5 then it also start adverizing s0/1
>> interface
>> to other RIP enable routers. How do I answer this task?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mac
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:16 ART