From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Sun Apr 20 2008 - 16:37:37 ART
Hehehehe... No worries. :) Good luck on your lab!
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Peter
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 4:44 PM
To: smorris@ipexpert.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Unmeantioned ntwrks
Thx Scott!
BTW, every time I use the ALT key when extracting the routes I remember ur
mail ;) It waived lot of annoying editing job. Thanks!
Cheers,
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:smorris@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 23:30
To: 'Peter'
Subject: RE: Unmeantioned ntwrks
It'll all depend on the specifics of the lab. I don't think there's a great
answer that will work ALL the time!
If nothing is mentioned, then you either don't care about the network, or
you don't care how it's advertised. Either way, asking the proctor is the
best solution!
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Peter
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 4:21 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Unmeantioned ntwrks
GS,
Sometimes I find loopbacks or some ntwrks not meantioned in the exercise
where to advertise.
So in such cases, shall we ask the proctor? What if more than 1 routing
protocol is running, which one shall we use?
It all depends on the proctor direction? Or we have the flexibility? (I
don't think this breaks the NDA?) just don't answer if it is.
Thanks,
Cheers,
Peter
Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
http://www.certscience.com/CCIE
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:51 ART