Unmeantioned ntwrks

From: Peter (engpeter@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Apr 20 2008 - 17:20:39 ART

• Next message: Peter: "RE: Unmeantioned ntwrks"
• Previous message: ccie784: "CCIE Security Bootcamp in London"
• Next in thread: Peter: "RE: Unmeantioned ntwrks"
• Maybe reply: Peter: "RE: Unmeantioned ntwrks"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Unmeantioned ntwrks"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

GS,

Sometimes I find loopbacks or some ntwrks not meantioned in the exercise
where to advertise.

So in such cases, shall we ask the proctor? What if more than 1 routing
protocol is running, which one shall we use?

It all depends on the proctor direction? Or we have the flexibility? (I
don't think this breaks the NDA?) just don't answer if it is.

Thanks,

Cheers,

Peter

Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
http://www.certscience.com/CCIE

• Next message: Peter: "RE: Unmeantioned ntwrks"
• Previous message: ccie784: "CCIE Security Bootcamp in London"
• Next in thread: Peter: "RE: Unmeantioned ntwrks"
• Maybe reply: Peter: "RE: Unmeantioned ntwrks"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Unmeantioned ntwrks"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:51 ART