Re: BGP full mesh

From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@huapi.ba.ar)
Date: Wed Apr 16 2008 - 06:19:59 ART

Joe,
when "peering over" the foreign as, you will encounter the same issues
as when peering non BGP talkers inside the AS, namely, the possibility
of looping traffic.
-Carlos

Joseph Brunner @ 15/04/2008 23:34 -0300 dixit:
> You don't want to enable sync if every router is running bgp - period. No
> need.
>
> You can just "peer over" the middle as, and choose points to run ebgp with
> that middle as. IBGP neighbors do not need to be directly connected.
>
> I'm sure others will offer you some confederation solutions to this...
> Others will proffer the local-as menagerie of commands.
>
> -Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of John
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 10:18 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: BGP full mesh
>
> If I have 2 groups of routers in the same as but seperated by a transit AS
> is
> full mesh required between the all the routers even though their seperated.
> Assume full mesh in between the routers in each group.
>
> Next, do you want to enable synchronization when you have a full mesh in an
> AS?
>
>
> Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
> http://www.certscience.com/CCIE
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
> http://www.certscience.com/CCIE
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
> 

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron@huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina

Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
http://www.certscience.com/CCIE

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:51 ART