Re: OSPF network

From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Apr 15 2008 - 20:33:43 ART

• Next message: Tony Schaffran \(GS\): "RE: dynamips on linux"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: contract or perm?"
• Maybe in reply to: John: "OSPF network"
• Next in thread: Sadiq Yakasai: "Re: OSPF network"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Sure you can. Lab it up.

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Sadiq Yakasai <sadiqtanko@gmail.com> wrote:
> Besides, one interface is mutually exclusive with the other one, isnt it?
>
> In other words, you cant have the main interface forming an OSPF
> adjacency and then still have the sub-interface under the same
> interface forming another adj. right?
>
>
>
> Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
> http://www.certscience.com/CCIE
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>

-- 
Ronald Angello
CCIE #17846
Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
http://www.certscience.com/CCIE

• Next message: Tony Schaffran \(GS\): "RE: dynamips on linux"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: contract or perm?"
• Maybe in reply to: John: "OSPF network"
• Next in thread: Sadiq Yakasai: "Re: OSPF network"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:51 ART