From: Mike Haddad (mike.haddad@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 30 2008 - 21:51:28 ART
Hello Shine,
You're right and as long as I understand the valid wildcards are : 1 3 7 15
31 63 127 and 255. So using a wild card of 12 is considered invalid?
Thanks,
> From: shinepjoseph@iprimus.com.au> To: mike.haddad@hotmail.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: RE: Multicast Grouping> Date: Sun, 30 Mar
2008 22:09:38 +1100> > Mike,> > Write them in binary.> 226 - 1110 0010> 12 -
0000 1100> > The possible combinations would be:> 1110 0010 - 226> 1110 0110 -
230> 1110 1010 - 234> 1110 1110 - 238> > So by having a mask of 12 you are are
matching only above 4 addresses.> > HTH,> Shine> > > -----Original
Message-----> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
Behalf Of Mike> Haddad> Sent: Sunday, 30 March 2008 5:55 PM> To:
ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: Multicast Grouping> > Hello,> > I still don't
understand why the below ACL can't be grouped:> interface Loopback0> ip pim
sparse-dense-mode> !> ip pim send-rp-announce Loopback0 scope 16 group-list
50> !> access-list 50 permit 226.0.0.0 1.255.255.255> access-list 50 permit
228.0.0.0 3.255.255.255> access-list 50 permit 232.0.0.0 3.255.255.255>
access-list 50 permit 236.0.0.0 1.255.255.255> access-list 50 permit 238.0.0.0
0.255.255.255> > > Why can't we group them as:> access-list 50 permit
226.0.0.0 12.255.255.255> > Thanks for the clarification,> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:54 ART