From: Z Linux (z.linux@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Mar 29 2008 - 09:34:13 ART
Hi 2 all,
I requested an answer for this question but no reply.... can some1
help....sw1=============SW2 ( ports 23/24 )sw1=============SW3 ( ports
19/20)sw1=============SW4 ( ports 21/22 )
sw2=============SW1 ( ports 23/24 )sw2=============SW3 ( ports
21/22)sw2=============SW4 ( ports 19/20 )
sw3=============SW1 ( ports 19/20 )sw3=============SW2 ( ports
21/22)sw3=============SW4 ( ports 23/24 )
sw4=============SW1 ( ports 21/22 )sw4=============SW2 ( ports
19/20)sw4=============SW3 ( ports 23/24 )
<Q> Customer have made some complaints of their systems running slow at times
between SW1 and SW2. To improve performance you decided to provide multiple
200M ports from the existing connections between all 4switches, andbalance
the
to traffic based on source/destination MAC address where possible, where the
commands is not available choose a method of balancing where the source and
destinationIP address is also enable for routed IP Traffic.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:54 ART