From: Joseph Saad (joseph.samir.saad@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 24 2008 - 10:02:50 ART
Simply, redistribute connected will undo the effect of redistributing the
protocol enabled-interfaces. Also both route-map and prefix-lists have an
implicit deny if you don't explicitly allow all prefixes (0.0.0.0/0 le 32)
or route-map bb2 permit 1000.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:07 PM, <Noor.Yousuf@shell.com> wrote:
> Experts,
>
> Quick question for all of you
>
> Connected interface(G0/1)---R2------ospf over FR-----R3
> |
> |
> EIGRP(G0/0)----R5
>
> When I use simple mutual redistribution b/w OSPF and EIGRP, it does work
> fine, as soon as I try to redistribute connected interface into OSPF which
> is not part of any routing protocol through Route-map, my EIGRP network gets
> drop on R3....any thoughts will be appreciated
>
> Here is the config of R2
>
> interface GigabitEthernet0/0
> ip address 16.16.17.2 255.255.255.0
> duplex auto
> speed auto
> !
> interface GigabitEthernet0/1
> ip address 150.5.16.1 255.255.255.0
> duplex auto
> speed auto
> !
> interface Serial0/0/0
> ip address 16.16.12.2 255.255.255.248
> encapsulation frame-relay
> ip ospf priority 0
> frame-relay map ip 16.16.12.3 413 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 16.16.12.5 413 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay lmi-type cisco
>
> router eigrp 16
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 1500 1 255 1 1500
> network 16.16.17.2 0.0.0.0
> no auto-summary
> !
> router ospf 1
> router-id 2.2.2.2
> log-adjacency-changes
> redistribute connected metric 100 subnets route-map bb2
> redistribute eigrp 16 metric 50 subnets
> network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 16.16.12.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> !
> ip prefix-list bb2 seq 5 permit 150.5.16.0/24
>
> route-map bb2 permit 10
> match ip address prefix-list bb2
>
> Thanks,
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:54 ART