Re: QoS marking - sub-interface vs main interface

From: Sadiq Yakasai (sadiqtanko@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 24 2008 - 09:06:53 ART

Next message: Carlos Trujillo: "Re: On which interface to apply the "no ip unreachables""
Previous message: Noor.Yousuf@shell.com: "RE: Please confirm (conf#77863d43f06e1817574a97d79e4a18b3)"
Maybe in reply to: Radioactive Frog: "QoS marking - sub-interface vs main interface"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: QoS marking - sub-interface vs main interface"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Frog,

I think your answer is: yes, yes!

Next message: Carlos Trujillo: "Re: On which interface to apply the "no ip unreachables""
Previous message: Noor.Yousuf@shell.com: "RE: Please confirm (conf#77863d43f06e1817574a97d79e4a18b3)"
Maybe in reply to: Radioactive Frog: "QoS marking - sub-interface vs main interface"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: QoS marking - sub-interface vs main interface"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:54 ART