From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Mon Mar 24 2008 - 09:29:34 ART
I'm pretty sure that FastEthernet interfaces don't have DLCI's in order to
do this. :)
My routers don't anyway.
As always, I'd suggest following the packet flow, and see what actually
occurs. In order for a packet to get processed by a policy, it has to move
THROUGH that policy. Does your packet get processed by fa0/0 and THEN
fa0/0.100?
The best way to look at this is to try it out! Learning by doing (or the
way that I try to do is learn by screwing it up then figuring out why!) is
the best way to cement the concepts in your head so you can go through these
things without fail.
JP - Even in a serial interface you still CAN work with subinterface
policies unless you have a good reason not to. So try following the packet.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
jatinder.p.singh@bt.com
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 6:29 AM
To: gopal.gupta@hp.com; pbhatkoti@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: QoS marking - sub-interface vs main interface
Gops,
you have to make the map-class frame-relay and apply the Service policy
under this map-class.
Under the Interface DLCI you have to apply that class.
Regards
J P Singh
________________________________
From: Gupta, Gopal (NWCC) [mailto:gopal.gupta@hp.com]
Sent: Mon 3/24/2008 10:11
To: Dhameeja,JPS,Jatinder,AXSC52 R; pbhatkoti@gmail.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: QoS marking - sub-interface vs main interface
Hi Jatinder,
Could you please elaborate, how would you do that under fast ethernet
interface based on DLCIs ?
Thanks,
Gops
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
jatinder.p.singh@bt.com
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 15:28
To: pbhatkoti@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: QoS marking - sub-interface vs main interface
Importance: Low
Dear Frog,
I dont know what u r planning to accomblish here. But both are wrong answer.
U always have to apply Service policy input or output under Interface DLCI
commands not direct on interface.
Regards
J P Singh
________________________________
From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Radioactive Frog
Sent: Mon 3/24/2008 05:17
To: ccie forum
Subject: QoS marking - sub-interface vs main interface
Option1:
-------------
interface fas0/0
service-policy input BLOCK
interface fas0/0.100
ip add 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface fas0/0.200
ip add 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
Option2:
-------------
interface fas0/0
interface fas0/0.100
ip add 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
service-policy input BLOCK
interface fas0/0.200
ip add 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
Question1: Will option1, will apply to sub-interface fas0/0.100 and
fas0/0.200.
Qusetion2: Will option2, only apply to fas0/0.100
My answers are: option1 - YES, option2- yes.
Can someone confirm if i am on the right track?
frog
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:54 ART