From: Kevin Howard (kevin@leh.net)
Date: Mon Mar 17 2008 - 20:15:45 ART
thanks for the replies. No, I didn't actually run traffic, I was thinking
some config errors would show up right away. Locally significant is
interesting thought, it does make sense.
>
>
> When you say you lab it up & there are no errors - are you running any
> traffic over the links in your lab ?
>
> R
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Howard" <kevin@leh.net>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 4:29 PM
> Subject: etherchannel load balancing - same config on both sides
>
>
>> Hello,
>> in looking through the doccd I cannot find this answer - when
>> configuring
>> load-bal on etherchannel, does the load-balacing scheme chosen need to
>> be
>> same on each side? When I lab it matching and not matching, there are no
>> errors indicating a problem, just want to check with the group.
>>
>> thanks.
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:53 ART