RE: need clarification on router-id and Loopback 0

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Mar 17 2008 - 10:26:32 ART

Unless, of course, you use the same loopback address on more than one
device. :)

Bottom line is that no matter which way you go, you should be aware of the
devices in your network!

Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor

A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!

smorris@ipexpert.com

 

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
srinivas pv
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 1:35 AM
To: abdul muhammed
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: need clarification on router-id and Loopback 0

Hi,

If the router-id is distinguishable from the router-ids of other routers in
your topology, it should be fine. To avoid these type of conflicts, it is
better to use loopback as router id.

Thanks,
Srinivas

On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:22 PM, abdul muhammed <abdulmuri@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi GS,
>
> what is the implication of using a different router-id from Loopback 0
> address.
>
>
> --
> Abdul Muhammed Murtala
> AMerican University of Nigeria
> Lamido Zubairu way, Yola
> Adamawa
> +2348052001153, +2348056201237
>
> Network Manager
> MCSE,MCDBA,MCSA,OCPDBA,CCNA,CCIE Written.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:53 ART