From: alexandros.sichlimiris@bt.com
Date: Wed Mar 12 2008 - 14:02:37 ARST
I certainly hope that this was something from a study lab, not the real
thing :-)
Cheers,
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Tony Schaffran (GS)
Sent: 06 March 2008 14:03
To: 'Mike Haddad'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Lab clarification
This would be considered an extreme violation of the NDA.
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Mike
Haddad
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 10:30 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Lab clarification
Hello,
I had OSPF, RIP and EIGRP running on the network. The lab didn't
specify
to
advertise the EIGRP router's loopbacks into EIGRP. Also, there was no
redistribution question. All I got is ensure that there is full
reachability
between the OSPF and EIGRP domain. In this situation, shall I advertise
the
missing networks in the EIGRP domains or I stick to whatever was
requested
to
be advertised in the beginning of the lab?
In other words, the target of the lab is to have full reachability
between
the networks. What shall I do if the lab didn't mention to advertise
certain
networks into certain IGP or BGP process?
Thanks,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:53 ART