From: Daniel Valle (danielfrvalle@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Mar 06 2008 - 11:30:47 ARST
You only need that if the networks you need to be redistributed are not
poart of the eigrp domain or if you specify a prefix-list or ACL in the
redistribution.
I mean, if you do:
*router eigrp 100
redistribute eigrp 200 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
network 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.255
network 172.16.100.0 0.0.3.255
network 172.16.124.0 0.0.0.255
no auto-summary
no eigrp log-neighbor-changes
!
router eigrp 200
redistribute eigrp 100 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
network 172.16.12.0 0.0.0.255
no auto-summary
no eigrp log-neighbor-changes
*
it works fine.
However, if you set the route-map into the redistribution of the EIGRP
domain, ex:
router eigrp 100
redistribute eigrp 200 route-map EIGRP200-EIGRP100
....
...
as sson as you do that, you will stop advertising your LAN that is part of
eigrp 200.
so to *fix* it, you would require the redistribute connected too.
quickly lab this up to see with your own eyes:) it worths the try.
HTH,
Daniel.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Gary Duncanson <
gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Yes you can do that.
>
> Regards
> Gary
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dennis Worth" <dennis.worth@gmail.com>
> To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 2:39 PM
> Subject: EIGRP redistribution between 2 process' ?
>
>
> > --
> > Dennis Worth
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:52 ART