From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Fri Feb 29 2008 - 22:13:52 ARST
Scott, re "the youtube engineer's fix" from the ripe page of advertising 2
/25's to be longer prefix matches then the /24 pakistan was hijacking-
Don't most providers deny 0.0.0.0/0 ge 25
Anyway?
Who accepted a /25?
Or all these years have I been fooled into thinking only
0.0.0.0/0 le 24 will work?
Thanks,
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Morris
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 1:25 PM
To: 'Shawn Zandi'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: Youtube BGP/IP hijacked
This is why filtering in BGP (in and out) is a good idea. But also a
demonstration of lack-of-BGP skills on a global basis!
Marketing opportunity? :)
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Shawn Zandi
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 12:56 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Youtube BGP/IP hijacked
As you may be aware from recent news reports, traffic to the youtube.com
website was 'hijacked' on a global scale on Sunday, 24 February 2008.
The incident was a result of the unauthorized BGP announcement of the prefix
208.65.153.0/24 and caused the popular video sharing website to become
unreachable from most, if not all, of the Internet.
http://www.ripe.net/news/study-youtube-hijacking.html
Shawn Zandi
www.shafagh.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:50 ARST