RE: RIP

From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Mon Feb 25 2008 - 18:03:17 ARST


1. According to the blueprint and to previous Ask-the-Expert forums with
CCIE proctors, the answer is no, no RIPv1. (not directly running anyway)

2. "implicit"? Doubtful. Good idea unless otherwise directed? Yup.

HTH,

Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor

A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!

smorris@ipexpert.com

 

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Marc
La Porte
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 2:58 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RIP

Hi experts!

A couple questions about RIP:

1. Is there still RIPv1 on the lab?
2. If it says to configure RIPv2 is it then implicit to configure "no
auto-summary"?

Scenario:
                                          f0/0 (VLAN_C)
                                                   | fa0/0 (VLAN_A) --- R1
--- serial --- R3 --- serial --- R2 --- fa0/0 (VLAN_B)

VLAN_A: 1.0.0.0/8
VLAN_B: 2.0.0.0/8
VLAN_C: 3.0.0.0/8
Serial (R1-R3): 13.0.0.0/8
Serial (R2-R3): 23.0.0.0/8

R3 should not advertise the route for VLAN B to R1 nor should it advertise
the route for VLAN A to R2...

My solution on R3:
router rip
 distribute-list 1 out serial 1/2 <--- direction of R2 distribute-list 2
out serial 1/1 <--- direction of R1 !
access-list 1 deny 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 access-list 1 permit any !
access-list 2 deny 2.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 access-list 2 permit any

IE Solution on R3:
router rip
 distribute-list prefix ONLY_VLAN_C out
!
ip prefix-list ONLY_VLAN_C seq 5 permit 3.0.0.0/8

Conclusion: I think my solution is better as it stops the advertisement of
VLAN_A and VLAN_B, but still advertises the subnets of the serial links. The
IE solutions doesn't do that... so I feel they filter more than requested...

Appreciate your input on both the questions and the scenario...

Marc



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:49 ARST