Re: I thought we should do what was asked and nothing more..

From: Vijay babu (dotcomvijay@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Feb 24 2008 - 22:19:47 ARST

• Next message: Nic: "ccie service provider"
• Previous message: Greg Wendel: "Re: I thought we should do what was asked and nothing more.."
• Maybe in reply to: Vijay babu: "I thought we should do what was asked and nothing more.."
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: I thought we should do what was asked and nothing more.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thanks all for the inputs.

So, In the lab if not all the routers are running BGP and we were asked to
have full reachability (on the intial
page of the lab book only) then we will have to redistribute the BGP into
IGP and vice versa?

Also, if the lab is asking me to redistribution between say EIGRP and OSPF
on two routers. Then will it be acceptable
to do a third redistribution on a third router? (well if I think this third
redistribution will help me to avoid routing loops etc)

Thanks
VIjay

• Next message: Nic: "ccie service provider"
• Previous message: Greg Wendel: "Re: I thought we should do what was asked and nothing more.."
• Maybe in reply to: Vijay babu: "I thought we should do what was asked and nothing more.."
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: I thought we should do what was asked and nothing more.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:49 ARST