Re: Frame-relay inverse-arp ...

From: Peter Kingston (kingstonp.ccie@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2008 - 01:22:42 ARST


Hello,

Is ip routing enabled on the routers?

-- 
Regards,

Peter Kingston Studying my CCIE

On Feb 16, 2008 12:59 AM, Mick Vaites <mick@pobox.net.uk> wrote:

> Hi All, > > I am guessing this must have been asked before ... but I cannot locate > it ... apologies in advance for asking again. > > I have been struggling to get inverse arp on a specific DLCI to come up > unless I specify it using "frame-relay interface-dlci [dlci] in the > config .. eg: > > R1 (connected to Frame switch with DLCI 102 103 104 105) > > interface Serial0/0 > encapsulation frame-relay > ip add 12.12.12.1 255.255.255.0 > no frame-relay inverse-arp ip 103 > no frame-relay inverse-arp ip 104 > no frame-relay inverse-arp ip 105 > > R2 (connected to Frame switch with DLCI 201 203 204 205) > interface Serial0/0 > encapsulation frame-relay > ip addresss 12.12.12.2 255.255.255.0 > no frame-relay inverse-arp ip 203 > no frame-relay inverse-arp ip 204 > no frame-relay inverse-arp ip 205 > > This senario produces no maps no matter how long I wait ... > > However adding : > > R1 > Serial0/0 > frame-relay interface-dlci 102 > R2 > Serial0/0 > frame-relay interface-dlci 201 > > and it springs into life. > > I believe the additional config is unnecessary but for the life of me I > am baffled as to why.I need it. > > Routers/IOS are 3640/12.4.8d and 2811/12.4.10c > > Thanks in advance > > Mick > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:49 ARST