From: YourPal (dearprudence28@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Feb 17 2008 - 22:56:56 ARST
Hi Group,
Appreciate a pointer for this.
Thank you.
BR,
Emil
On 2/14/08, YourPal <dearprudence28@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Group,
>
> I have the following simple multicast scenario:
>
>
> R3 (s0/0) -------Frame relay------- (s0/0.134 mp) R4 (Fa0/0)
> |
> |
> |
> |
> Frame relay
> |
> |
> |
> |
> R1 (s0/0/0.134 mp)
>
>
> Details:
>
> - The interfaces are sparse mode.
> - R1 joins multicast group 228.34.28.100 on its Fa0/0 interface. R4 is the
> RP for this group.
> - RP discovery uses Bootstrap protocol. R3 is the BSR.
> - The "ip pim nbma-mode" command is prohibited on R3. To work around, a
> GRE tunnel is built between R1 & R4 with PIM sparse mode enabled.
>
> The task is to configure the network so that R1 responds to ICMP echo
> requests sent to 228.34.28.100 coming from R4's Fa0/0 interface.
>
> Assuming everything is configured correctly, I'd like to know how to test
> it. Should I do extended ping as follows?
>
> R4#pi
> Protocol [ip]:
> Target IP address: 228.34.28.100
> Repeat count [1]:
> Datagram size [100]:
> Timeout in seconds [2]:
> Extended commands [n]: y
> Interface [All]: <Which interface??>
> Time to live [255]:
> Source address: <R4's Fa0/0 ip address>
> Type of service [0]:
> .
> .
>
> What interface should I specify?
>
> Or should I just do "pi 228.34.28.100 so fa0/0"? Any difference?
>
> Appreciate any help.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> BR,
> Emil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:49 ARST