From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sat Feb 09 2008 - 18:29:08 ARST
In the grand scheme of things, especially in lab environments, I don't think
it matters all that much. Being 8k off one way or the other is more than
likely not going to make you drop lots of packets. Unless you have a fairly
saturated line or are THAT close to needing more. :)
But technically 24 channels at 64K a piece is 1536.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
keith tokash
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 12:40 PM
To: Navid Daghighi; Cisco certification
Subject: RE: 1544 or 1536
I've wondered this too, and haven't come up with a definitive answer (unless
they specify, which I haven't seen). 1536 is more accurate I suppose, but
some might argue the other way. I settle for making sure that whichever I
choose, I make it the same everywhere in case we're dealing with OSPF/EIGRP
decisions. Sorry for half an answer. :(
With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and
with science.
--Carl Sagan
> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:03:39 +0100
> From: smart4D@free.fr
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: 1544 or 1536
>
> Hi,
>
> On SGs, I see both "bandwidth 1544" and "bandwidth 1536"
>
> What criteria should be used to select one or the other ?
>
> thanks,
> Navid
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:48 ARST