RE: 1544 or 1536

From: mohamed ouamer (mohamedouamer@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 09 2008 - 16:27:38 ARST

Next message: Marc La Porte: "Re: PPPoFR (with Dynamips)"
Previous message: keith tokash: "RE: 1544 or 1536"
Maybe in reply to: Navid Daghighi: "1544 or 1536"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: 1544 or 1536"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Do "sh int type number | in BW" to determine the actual bandwith of the
interface.

> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:03:39 +0100> From: smart4D@free.fr> To:
ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: 1544 or 1536> > Hi,> > On SGs, I see both
"bandwidth 1544" and "bandwidth 1536"> > What criteria should be used to
select one or the other ?> > thanks,> Navid> >

Next message: Marc La Porte: "Re: PPPoFR (with Dynamips)"
Previous message: keith tokash: "RE: 1544 or 1536"
Maybe in reply to: Navid Daghighi: "1544 or 1536"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: 1544 or 1536"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:48 ARST