From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Fri Feb 01 2008 - 23:02:30 ARST
If the debug output irritates you, create an mroute! Otherwise, due to the
dense mode operation (and therefore "chatty" behavior), it's really not
necessary to do. Just personal preference.
Working networks will let you know the necessity!
Cheers,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
wim.depauw@getronics.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:42 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: CCIE lab :Mroute Configuration
Hi,
I had an interesting discussion with one of my collegues about one of the
labs of Internetwork expert and the use of mroutes.
When we have double uplink (let's suppose S1/1 and fa0/0) and we want to
send the multicast traffic via the serial link.Our routing protocol will
show the best path via the Fa0/0 so we will get an RPF problem.
=> We configure an mroute for the source
BUT when we do a debug ip mpacket we will still get an error message for the
groups 224.0.0.39 and 224.0.0.40 although it functions fine .
Do we need to configure an mroute also for the Mapping agent and the RP ?
My opinion is that we don't need to do it because the groups 224.0.0.39-40
are in dense mode so they are received anyway.
How do we need to do this in the exam ?
gr
wim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:47 ARST