From: Gary Duncanson (gary.duncanson@googlemail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 28 2008 - 09:36:06 ARST
Wouldn't redistribute connected make the routes external as opposed to
putting them into an area?
You will find a lot of labbooks using the 12.3 command you have mentioned.
----- Original Message -----
From: "theKonqueror" <thekonqueror@gmail.com>
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 8:57 PM
Subject: Redistribute connected alternatives
> In OSPF configuration, there are questions like "add interface fa1/0 in
> area
> 43 but don't use network command for this".
>
> I know we can do redistribution of connected interfaces to achieve this,
> but
> I came across this in Cisco Certification Guide v.2 (Page 295):
>
> ----
> As of Cisco IOS Software Release 12.3(11)T, OSPF configuration can
> completely omit the
> network command, instead relying on the ip ospf process-id area area-id
> interface subcommand.
> This new command enables OSPF on the interface and selects the area. For
> instance, on R3 in
> Example 10-8, the network 10.3.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 3 command could have
> been deleted and
> replaced with the ip ospf 1 area 3 command under S0/0.1 and e0/0.
> ----
>
> Can we use this type of config instead of redist connected? Or is this
> some
> type of macro that coverts the interface main IP to network command format
> internally?
>
> --
> Bugs can neither be created nor be removed from software by a developer.
> They can only be converted from one form to another. The total number of
> bugs in the software always remain constant.
>
> .}l}..}l}.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:38:02 ARST