From: Gary Duncanson (gary.duncanson@googlemail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2008 - 17:01:08 ARST
Ah..right. There we are then. I figured that was on another interface.
Should work then.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cielieska Nathan" <ncielieska@gmail.com>
To: "Gary Duncanson" <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; "Darren Johnson" <dazza_johnson@yahoo.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I have no
doubt about my answers.
> Note
>
> router rip
> passive-inteface s1/0
>
> Regards,
> Nate
> On Jan 21, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Gary Duncanson wrote:
>
>> Nate,
>>
>> Seems ok for inbound updates on s1/0, but for int s1/0 wont the updates
>> still be sent out?
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cielieska Nathan"
>> <ncielieska@gmail.com>
>> To: "Gary Duncanson" <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
>> Cc: "Darren Johnson" <dazza_johnson@yahoo.co.uk>;
>> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 6:11 PM
>> Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I have no
>> doubt about my answers.
>>
>>
>>> hows about
>>>
>>> router rip
>>> passive-interface s1/0
>>>
>>> access-list 101 deny udp 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 eq 520
>>> access-list 101 permit ip any any
>>>
>>> int s1/0
>>> ip access-group 101 in
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Nate
>>>
>>> On Jan 21, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Gary Duncanson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Offset-list can poison the route but will it actually prevent it
>>>> being received by the interface?
>>>>
>>>> Requirement - 'RIP routes neither sent or received on the interface'
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Johnson"
>>>> <dazza_johnson@yahoo.co.uk>
>>>> To: "'Gary Duncanson'" <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>; "'Farhan
>>>> Anwar'" <farhan.anwar@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 1:19 PM
>>>> Subject: RE: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I have
>>>> no doubt about my answers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Also, setting the AD to 255, or using an offset-list to make the
>>>>> route
>>>>> unreachable.....
>>>>>
>>>>> :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be so much easier if RIP formed adj like EIGRP and OSPF ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Dazzler
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>>>>> Of Gary
>>>>> Duncanson
>>>>> Sent: 19 January 2008 16:23
>>>>> To: Farhan Anwar
>>>>> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>>>> Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I have
>>>>> no
>>>>> doubt about my answers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Will that block outbound or inbound depending on access-group in or
>>>>> out?
>>>>>
>>>>> I take it you mean distribute list with gateway statement plus
>>>>> extended acl
>>>>> ?
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: Farhan Anwar
>>>>> To: Gary Duncanson
>>>>> Cc: Felix Nkansah ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 1:55 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I
>>>>> have no
>>>>> doubt about my answers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Distribute list with gateway statement + prefix-list denying that
>>>>> gateway
>>>>> and permitting others
>>>>> or
>>>>> an extended acl on interface having deny statement for rip.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 18, 2008 12:45 PM, Gary Duncanson
>>>>> <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a good one Felix. What would be a decent alternative do
>>>>> you think
>>>>> to
>>>>> passive-interface? Distribute-list?
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Felix Nkansah" <felixnkansah@gmail.com>
>>>>> To: "sirus MOGHADASIAN" <cyrus.mgh@gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc: "groupstudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:36 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I
>>>>> have no
>>>>> doubt about my answers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > HI sirus,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It's difficult to understand why we failed or got low marks in
>>>>> some
>>>>> > sections. It requires a sincere examination of one's self to
>>>>> admit a
>>>>> > failure.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > A simple task may not be as simple as it seems. If it's that
>>>>> simple,
>>>>> why
>>>>> > are
>>>>> > you tested on it in the difficult & coveted CCIE lab. Besides,
>>>>> remember
>>>>> > that
>>>>> > the the ccie lab is an 'ALL OR NOTHING GAME.'
>>>>> >
>>>>> > No partial credits. Marks are awarded for perfect answers only
>>>>> (ones
>>>>> that
>>>>> > meet ALL requirements without breaking ANY requirement).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > As an example, let's assume a candidate had a task like below:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > TASK 3.X Configure RIP on R1 for the specified interfacees.
>>>>> Ensure
>>>>> that
>>>>> > RIP
>>>>> > routes are neither sent nor received on interface S1/0.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > This question is simple, but it only seems so. So we provide a
>>>>> solution
>>>>> > like
>>>>> > below:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > R1
>>>>> >
>>>>> > router rip
>>>>> > ver 2
>>>>> > no auto
>>>>> > network x.x.x.x
>>>>> > network y.y.y.y
>>>>> > passive-interface s1/0
>>>>> >
>>>>> > A candidate may assume the 'passive-interface' command would
>>>>> meet the
>>>>> > second
>>>>> > requirement.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > WRONG.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Passive-interface only prevents SENDING of routes, and not
>>>>> RECEIVING
>>>>> of
>>>>> > routes. So the candidate scores a 0 for not meeting ALL
>>>>> requirements
>>>>> for
>>>>> > this 'simple' task. He is perplexed and doubts his scores.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Please dont give up. Reexamine yourself sincerely again. Take
>>>>> the
>>>>> > suggestions provided by the other experts, and you shall surely
>>>>> come
>>>>> home
>>>>> > after your next lab with a number.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Felix
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> ___________________________________________________________________ __
>>>>> __
>>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>
>>>>> ___________________________________________________________________ __
>>>>> __
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Farhan Anwar
>>>>> www.farhananwar.com
>>>>>
>>>>> ___________________________________________________________________ __
>>>>> __
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___________________________________________________________
>>>>> Win tickets to the 2006 FIFA World Cup Germany with Yahoo!
>>>>> Messenger. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/fifaworldcup_uk/
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________________________ __
>>>> _
>>>> Subscription information may be found at: http:// www.groupstudy.com/
>>>> list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:38:00 ARST