From: Cielieska Nathan (ncielieska@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2008 - 16:53:26 ARST
Note
router rip
passive-inteface s1/0
Regards,
Nate
On Jan 21, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Gary Duncanson wrote:
> Nate,
>
> Seems ok for inbound updates on s1/0, but for int s1/0 wont the
> updates still be sent out?
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cielieska Nathan"
> <ncielieska@gmail.com>
> To: "Gary Duncanson" <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
> Cc: "Darren Johnson" <dazza_johnson@yahoo.co.uk>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 6:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I
> have no doubt about my answers.
>
>
>> hows about
>>
>> router rip
>> passive-interface s1/0
>>
>> access-list 101 deny udp 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 eq 520
>> access-list 101 permit ip any any
>>
>> int s1/0
>> ip access-group 101 in
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nate
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Gary Duncanson wrote:
>>
>>> Offset-list can poison the route but will it actually prevent it
>>> being received by the interface?
>>>
>>> Requirement - 'RIP routes neither sent or received on the interface'
>>>
>>> Gary
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Johnson"
>>> <dazza_johnson@yahoo.co.uk>
>>> To: "'Gary Duncanson'" <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>; "'Farhan
>>> Anwar'" <farhan.anwar@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 1:19 PM
>>> Subject: RE: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I
>>> have no doubt about my answers.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Also, setting the AD to 255, or using an offset-list to make
>>>> the route
>>>> unreachable.....
>>>>
>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> It would be so much easier if RIP formed adj like EIGRP and
>>>> OSPF ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Dazzler
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
>>>> Behalf Of Gary
>>>> Duncanson
>>>> Sent: 19 January 2008 16:23
>>>> To: Farhan Anwar
>>>> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>>> Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I
>>>> have no
>>>> doubt about my answers.
>>>>
>>>> Will that block outbound or inbound depending on access-group
>>>> in or out?
>>>>
>>>> I take it you mean distribute list with gateway statement plus
>>>> extended acl
>>>> ?
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Farhan Anwar
>>>> To: Gary Duncanson
>>>> Cc: Felix Nkansah ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 1:55 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now
>>>> I have no
>>>> doubt about my answers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Distribute list with gateway statement + prefix-list denying
>>>> that gateway
>>>> and permitting others
>>>> or
>>>> an extended acl on interface having deny statement for rip.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 18, 2008 12:45 PM, Gary Duncanson
>>>> <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That's a good one Felix. What would be a decent alternative
>>>> do you think
>>>> to
>>>> passive-interface? Distribute-list?
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Felix Nkansah" <felixnkansah@gmail.com>
>>>> To: "sirus MOGHADASIAN" <cyrus.mgh@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: "groupstudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:36 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now
>>>> I have no
>>>> doubt about my answers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > HI sirus,
>>>> >
>>>> > It's difficult to understand why we failed or got low
>>>> marks in some
>>>> > sections. It requires a sincere examination of one's self
>>>> to admit a
>>>> > failure.
>>>> >
>>>> > A simple task may not be as simple as it seems. If it's
>>>> that simple,
>>>> why
>>>> > are
>>>> > you tested on it in the difficult & coveted CCIE lab. Besides,
>>>> remember
>>>> > that
>>>> > the the ccie lab is an 'ALL OR NOTHING GAME.'
>>>> >
>>>> > No partial credits. Marks are awarded for perfect answers
>>>> only (ones
>>>> that
>>>> > meet ALL requirements without breaking ANY requirement).
>>>> >
>>>> > As an example, let's assume a candidate had a task like below:
>>>> >
>>>> > TASK 3.X Configure RIP on R1 for the specified
>>>> interfacees. Ensure
>>>> that
>>>> > RIP
>>>> > routes are neither sent nor received on interface S1/0.
>>>> >
>>>> > This question is simple, but it only seems so. So we provide a
>>>> solution
>>>> > like
>>>> > below:
>>>> >
>>>> > R1
>>>> >
>>>> > router rip
>>>> > ver 2
>>>> > no auto
>>>> > network x.x.x.x
>>>> > network y.y.y.y
>>>> > passive-interface s1/0
>>>> >
>>>> > A candidate may assume the 'passive-interface' command
>>>> would meet the
>>>> > second
>>>> > requirement.
>>>> >
>>>> > WRONG.
>>>> >
>>>> > Passive-interface only prevents SENDING of routes, and not
>>>> RECEIVING
>>>> of
>>>> > routes. So the candidate scores a 0 for not meeting ALL
>>>> requirements
>>>> for
>>>> > this 'simple' task. He is perplexed and doubts his scores.
>>>> >
>>>> > Please dont give up. Reexamine yourself sincerely again.
>>>> Take the
>>>> > suggestions provided by the other experts, and you shall
>>>> surely come
>>>> home
>>>> > after your next lab with a number.
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> >
>>>> > Felix
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________
>>>> __ __
>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________
>>>> __ __
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Farhan Anwar
>>>> www.farhananwar.com
>>>>
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________
>>>> __ __
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___________________________________________________________
>>>> Win tickets to the 2006 FIFA World Cup Germany with Yahoo!
>>>> Messenger. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/fifaworldcup_uk/
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________________
>>> __ _
>>> Subscription information may be found at: http://
>>> www.groupstudy.com/ list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:38:00 ARST