From: subodh.rawat@wipro.com
Date: Wed Jan 16 2008 - 18:46:33 ARST
Hey monica ...u r a mystery.
R u monica or nalini?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Monica Belluci
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 5:24 AM
To: Mick Vaites
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IPv6 Frame-relay map's
Hey Mick,
Even I was confused before but if u check Doc cd you will find it
Broadcast keyword on link address only 5 I worked with Intrnetwk labs
same thing observed.
thanks
Monica Bel
On 1/15/08, Mick Vaites <mick@pobox.net.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am puzzling over which is correct and which is not.
>
> It is necessary to put in L2 / L3 mappings for both the actual IPv6
> addressing as well as the lnik local addresses but which gets the
> broadcast statement?
>
> Senario: two routers connected for IPv6, R1 and R5 over a frame-relay
> cloud, network is 2001:cc1e:5:15::x/64 and the DLCI's are 105 and 501
> respectively. This are the possible snippets for R1. (apologies for
> any obvious typos).
>
> I am wondering which is right
>
> !R1
> Interface Serial 1/0
> ipv6 address 2001:cc1e:5:15::1/64
> ipv6 address fe80::1 link-local
> frame-relay map ipv6 fe80::5 105 broadcast <---- broadcast on the
> link-local
> frame-relay map ipv6 2001:cc1e:5:15::5 105
>
> or
>
> !R1
> Interface Serial 1/0
> ipv6 address 2001:cc1e:5:15::1/64
> ipv6 address fe80::1 link-local
> frame-relay map ipv6 fe80::5 105
> frame-relay map ipv6 2001:cc1e:5:15::5 105 broadcast <-----
> broadcast on the main IP
>
> I have tried both of these senarios and both work okay ?
>
> Best regards
>
> Mick
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:38:00 ARST