IPv6 Frame-relay map's

From: Mick Vaites (mick@pobox.net.uk)
Date: Mon Jan 14 2008 - 22:25:04 ARST

• Next message: Paul Borghese: "RE: ccielab groupstudy list duplicating message"
• Previous message: John Parker: "IE Mentor Service Provider Bootcamp and Workbook"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi all,

I am puzzling over which is correct and which is not.

It is necessary to put in L2 / L3 mappings for both the actual IPv6
addressing as well as the lnik local addresses but which gets the
broadcast statement?

Senario: two routers connected for IPv6, R1 and R5 over a frame-relay
cloud, network is 2001:cc1e:5:15::x/64 and the DLCI's are 105 and 501
respectively. This are the possible snippets for R1. (apologies for any
obvious typos).

I am wondering which is right

!R1
Interface Serial 1/0
  ipv6 address 2001:cc1e:5:15::1/64
  ipv6 address fe80::1 link-local
  frame-relay map ipv6 fe80::5 105 broadcast <---- broadcast on the
link-local
  frame-relay map ipv6 2001:cc1e:5:15::5 105

or

!R1
Interface Serial 1/0
  ipv6 address 2001:cc1e:5:15::1/64
  ipv6 address fe80::1 link-local
  frame-relay map ipv6 fe80::5 105
  frame-relay map ipv6 2001:cc1e:5:15::5 105 broadcast <----- broadcast
on the main IP

I have tried both of these senarios and both work okay ?

Best regards

Mick

• Next message: Paul Borghese: "RE: ccielab groupstudy list duplicating message"
• Previous message: John Parker: "IE Mentor Service Provider Bootcamp and Workbook"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:37:59 ARST