RE: DOT1x

From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Thu Jan 10 2008 - 23:55:10 ARST

Next message: Scott Vermillion: "RE: IE Mock Labs - which ones to do?"
Previous message: Cisco Nuts: "RE: Inter-AS MVPN Question - ?"
Maybe in reply to: Gupta, Gopal (NWCC): "DOT1x"
Next in thread: Joseph Saad: "Re: DOT1x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

There is an "auth-fail" configuration as well as a "guest-vlan" one. They
do not have to be the same vlan.

The first is for authentication attempted but failed. The second is for no
auth attempt at all (no supplicant).

HTH,

Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor

A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!

smorris@ipexpert.com

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Gupta, Gopal (NWCC)
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 12:59 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DOT1x

Hi Experts,

If question asks you if the client fails authorization then it must go to
vlan 10

does it have same meaning as it must go to Guest-VLAN, coz acc to the
question it says authorization and not authentication(which already has
passed)

am i correct in my thoughts????

Thanks
Gops

Next message: Scott Vermillion: "RE: IE Mock Labs - which ones to do?"
Previous message: Cisco Nuts: "RE: Inter-AS MVPN Question - ?"
Maybe in reply to: Gupta, Gopal (NWCC): "DOT1x"
Next in thread: Joseph Saad: "Re: DOT1x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:37:58 ARST