Re: IPv6 Redistribution - Best Practice?

From: Chris Riling (criling@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 27 2007 - 12:48:34 ART


I think I just lost some brain cells ;)

Chris

On 12/27/07, Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com> wrote:
>
> LOL
>
> What did the CCIEs have for dinner?
>
> It was a prix fixe meal
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Chris Riling
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:28 AM
> To: Joseph Brunner
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: IPv6 Redistribution - Best Practice?
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 12/27/07, Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > I would say yes, unless a task says something like "only IPv6 prefixes
> > learned by OSPFv3 should be considered for redistribution into ripng".
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Chris Riling
> > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:58 AM
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: IPv6 Redistribution - Best Practice?
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Is it considered best practice to use "include-connected" on all v6
> > redistributions to prevent any sort of reachability issues?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chris
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:32 ARST