RE: IPv6 Redistribution - Best Practice?

From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Thu Dec 27 2007 - 12:44:20 ART


LOL

What did the CCIEs have for dinner?

It was a prix fixe meal

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Chris Riling
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:28 AM
To: Joseph Brunner
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: IPv6 Redistribution - Best Practice?

Thanks!

On 12/27/07, Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com> wrote:
>
> I would say yes, unless a task says something like "only IPv6 prefixes
> learned by OSPFv3 should be considered for redistribution into ripng".
>
> Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Chris Riling
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:58 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: IPv6 Redistribution - Best Practice?
>
> Hi All,
>
> Is it considered best practice to use "include-connected" on all v6
> redistributions to prevent any sort of reachability issues?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:32 ARST